WEBINAR SERIES
Missed our live webinars? Catch up with the recordings below...
Effectiveness or Implementation: Why not both? A Hybrid Designs Webinar
“It takes an average of 17 years for 14% of original research to be integrated into clinical practice among physicians”.
As shocking as the above catchcry may seem, that's the estimate that we've been hearing over and over again in the realm of implementation science. So the question is... what can be done by researchers and practitioners to help speed up the process of translating research into real-world uptake impact? Some have called this a “methodologist’s dream”, i.e., combining effectiveness and implementation in varying degrees in one design.
In this interactive webinar, A/Prof Luke Wolfenden provided an overview, design considerations, strengths and challenges of hybrid designs, tips for seeking grant funding and future directions. Dr Joanne Beames and Dr Ursula Sansom-Daly provided case studies of Type I and Type II hybrid studies focused on using technology to deliver effective and scalable depression and psychosocial cancer care. This session was moderated by Dr Ben Smith, who is working with the Translational Cancer Research Centres to build implementation science capacity and collaborations for better cancer outcomes through the Implementation Science Community of Practice.
Slides available in PDF
A/Prof Luke Wolfenden's slides
Dr Joanne Beames slides
Dr Ursula Sansom-Daly slides
A/Prof Luke Wolfenden's slides
Dr Joanne Beames slides
Dr Ursula Sansom-Daly slides
Implementation of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond
The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled many cancer care health professionals into the unfamiliar territory of telehealth. Now that some time has passed since new measures have been in place, how will telehealth in cancer care be maintained after the pandemic ends?
This interactive webinar discussed:
This interactive webinar discussed:
- How COVID-19 has affected telehealth in cancer care
- How implementation science can be used for the sustained implementation of telehealth
- How to help those who may have access issues or limited telehealth literacy
WEBINAR:
|
|
The terminology of impact and translation was introduced by funders, but the question of how this can be achieved still remains. The advantages of implementing KT strategies are increased opportunities to create impact and to work closely with key organisations and policy stakeholders. Working in partnership with research users from conception can provide mechanisms to ensure your research makes a difference, with the partners being the drivers for change in policy and practice. This webinar will highlight how translation is a system of processes that lead to & enable research impact. The processes, planning, and barriers associated with achieving research impact through a KT system will be presented plus an example of where KT methodologies have led to positive and measurable impact.
Resources
Slides available as a PDF here
Making a Real World Impact: Cracking the Nut of Policy with the Sunbed Ban
|
This webinar tells the story of the sunbed ban in Australia. It gives a brief overview of the scientific evidence, the steps that were taken to influence government policy, and the facilitators and barriers to the policy-making process.
Join Anne to hear about her experience advocating for the sunbed ban, and understand the factors which influenced the public and government to lead to changing attitudes and policy. THE PRESENTER Associate Professor Anne Cust is an epidemiologist, leading the Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research group at the School of Public Health, The University of Sydney. Her research focuses on cancer (mainly melanoma) etiology, prevention and survivorship, with a strong emphasis on research translation. She is supported by Career Development Fellowships from the NHMRC and the Cancer Institute NSW. |
|
PREVIOUS WEBINARS
|
Mentored training in dissemination & implementation science in cancer (MT-DIRC): A Fellow's perspective
|
Tips of the Trade: Conducting Implementation Research, a Case Study webinar + Q&A
|
|
Dr Nicole Rankin, T2/T3 Research fellow at Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre
|
by A/Prof Chris Paul, NHMRC Career Development Fellow with the School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour and Hunter Medical Research Institute
|
|
Nicole shares her experience as a Fellow on the 2-year Mentored training in dissemination & implementation science in cancer (MT-DIRC) fellowship at Washington University in St Louis. Understand what's involved, what the benefits are and how you can apply for the implementation science training.
|
This case study webinar will give you a practical overview of how A/Prof Chris Paul and colleagues have developed and are undertaking an implementation science research project ‘Pathways to Smoking Care Implementation Project (P-SCIP), funded by the Cancer Institute NSW Implementation Working Group.
|
The Role of Patient Reported Outcomes in Patient Centered Careby Prof. Afaf Girgis, Director of the Psycho-oncology Research Group at the Ingham Institute & UNSW
Change Management: a process perspective |
The Black Box of Implementation Science:by Helen Crisp, Assistant Director of Research at the Health Foundation in the UK
When, Why and How to do Translational (T3) Research: |
|
by Prof Clive Smallman, Professor of Management and A/Vice Chancellor at UWS
Implementation Science and Quality Improvementby Prof Tim Shaw, Director Research in Implementation Science and eHealth, University of Sydney, and Carrie Marr, Executive Director Organisational Effectiveness for Western Sydney LHD
|
by Laureate Professor Rob Sanson-Fisher from the Health Behaviour Research Group, School of Medicine and Public Health at the University of Newcastle.
Using Online Learning Interventions in Quality Improvement and Implementation Science:by Professor Tim Shaw, University of Sydney and Ulfat Sheikh
|
